Us and Them: Gen Z strikes back
Opinion
LawNews values and welcomes opinion and commentary pieces from all sides of the political and social spectrum, supporting the right of individuals to hold and express diverse perspectives. We appreciate the richness that different viewpoints bring to meaningful discussions and are committed to publishing a wide range of voices for consideration and engagement. These pieces reflect the views of individual writers, not those of LawNews or The Law Association of New Zealand. As opinion pieces rather than news stories, they are not bound by an ethical requirement for balance at the time of publication.
If you have a different perspective, we encourage you to join the conversation by submitting your own opinion for publication on the LawNews website.
Most recent
Boundary disputes: did Shane Jones go too far?
Criticising the judiciary
WFH: A1000-mile commute for new Starbucks boss
Shane Jones calls for Waitangi Tribunal review
The Waitangi Tribunal’s constitutional over-reach
What is the rule of law?
This matter of tikanga: an update and an addendum
Stirring racial division with no regard to reality?
Queenin decision spells out the importance of a settlor’s intentions for a trust
Third rails and thought crimes
Freedom of speech: a bouquet to the University of Otago
Free speech is the sine qua non of justice
Does size matter? Yes, if you’re talking about employment law
Siouxsie Wiles decision a wake-up call for all employers with public-facing staff
This matter of tikanga
Further clarification on Teika v District Court
Sue me, if you can. How laws that prevent directors being sued make firms less likely to recall potentially dangerous products
A dire warning for Christopher Luxon’s coalition
Teika v District Court: a response to Warren Brookbanks
No results found.