Application for extension of time to appeal – refusal where appeal “would be hopeless” and “could not possibly succeed” – striking out of appeals as an abuse of process – whether right-thinking people would regard the court as exercising very poor control of its process if it was to permit the matter to proceed further
O’Neill v Maidment [2025] NZCA 268
Christopher O’Neill brought three judicial review proceedings, each of which was later struck out by a High Court judge as an abuse of process under rule 5.35 High Court Rules 2016.
The first proceeding (CA541/2024) was brought against Rex Maidment, the Legal Complaints Review Officer (LCRO) and a Ministry of Justice official who provided administrative support. In a judgment given on 21 December 2023, Moore J concluded that the application disclosed no reviewable error in any aspect of the LCRO’s actions and decisions and struck the proceeding out as an abuse of process.
Unlock this article and all PREMIUM content by subscribing to LawNews
Already a subscriber?
0 Comments